Everything about h335 load data 308
Everything about h335 load data 308
Blog Article
Then there are actually other approaches that commence out by essentially touching the lands w/ the beginning load. Looks as if the above and H335 may lead to the perfect storm.
The .223 is slower Understanding for me but is starting to become really gratifying. In the event the snow melts I am going to get some distinctive fat bullets and find out how she does.
I'm new to reloading myself this yr for rifle. I do have about 6000 rounds beneath my belt this calendar year by yourself,So im still during the lookup manner for expirence from all sources.
Posted: five/three/2016 7:forty seven:forty eight AM EDT [#9] I've been striving CFE223 with a few 55 grain bullets. Still working with it. I can mention that it seems to "feed" pretty much. I've been making use of my Hornady electronic powder evaluate/scale while working up my loads. The CFE223 feeds so speedy the powder measure can not accurately meter it (the electronic one particular). It presents me frequent above alarms. Even utilizing the method button to slow down the metering greater than placing it in "slow" won't operate. I've not tried it during the common powder measure yet but assume It might be extremely consistent. I did, kind of Fortunate really, run throughout a very exact BLC2 load a couple array excursions back again.
I have utilised BLC 2 For many years. Just You should not go away your ammo out from the Solar for several hours if it's sizzling outdoors.
There may very well be some variances in The inner development concerning the TAC lines and one other Barnes lines. Bodily, I can't evaluate any dissimilarities amongst the 22406 plus the 22460. I have got several of Every single sitting down on my shelf.
And most importantly during these periods, it's always obtainable when everything else is away from stock.
Personally, my experience and impression of the two powders continues to be virtually the other of yours. CFE 223 will execute much better the extended your barrel is plus the heavier the bullet you use. My feelings are that CFE 223 is true over the verge of getting much too slow of the powder to even use in 223.
In addition they attribute a thicker cup and a specifically angled anvil to assist protect against slam fires related to selected rifles, like the M1A/M14. Even in sporting rifles, some reloading manuals recommend magnum primers with specific spherical powders to assure reputable ignition.
That’s not to convey it’s just as very easy to stuff a seventy seven-grain bullet to the heaviest situation you’re reloading atop a full demand of BL-C(2) as it really is Using the lightest bit of brass from the batch. Just that, in many applications, you won’t uncover an important variance than if you just segregate your cases by headstamp.
Constantly, ALWAYS get started on the minimum powder load and perform up, it doesn't matter what bullet and/or powder you might be making use of.
I assume is flows really easy, so speedy, the turning feeder tube that carries powder within the hopper to the size pan read more would feed it so rapidly it could operate in excess of the load before the feeder tube would slow down. I attempted modifying the pace in the feeder tube and time it slowed down to complete from the demand and practically nothing assisted. I had to try and do many powder trickling into the scale pan manually to get by way of Those people 50 rounds of test/demo ammo. I have not tried out the CFE223 since as the trial loads did not impress me for group dimension vs. the BLC2 or H335.
I use it quite thoroughly in looking loads because I’m pleased with moment of deer (ordinarily much better with 3 shot teams @ about an inch) accuracy furthermore highest velocity.
I nearly always write my posts despite material inside of a jovial manor and intent . If which is not the way you took it , please attempt once again .